Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN

Taux de hachage 2.7 TH/s Puissance 697 W Efficiency 258.2 J/TH
VS
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)

Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)

Taux de hachage 23.0 TH/s Puissance 1,541 W Efficiency 67.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN vs Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN Specification Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
2.7 TH/s Taux de hachage 23.0 TH/s
697 W Consommation électrique 1,541 W
258.2 J/TH Efficiency 67.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
7,500.0 kg Weight 6,600.0 kg
2,378 BTU/hr BTU Output 5,258 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN

Daily Revenue 0.00000124 BTC $0.10
Daily Electricity -$1.67
Daily Profit -$1.58
Monthly -$47.32
Yearly -$575.70

Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00001058 BTC $0.81
Daily Electricity -$3.70
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.53
Yearly -$1,052.83

Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 752% more hashrate (2.7 vs 23.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN and Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 752% more hashrate (2.7 vs 23.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S7-LN 55% better power draw (697 vs 1,541 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 74% better efficacité (258.2 vs 67.0 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 12% better weight (7,500 vs 6,600 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 121% more heat output (2,378 vs 5,258 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain Antminer S7-LN 7% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer S7-LN

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)

67.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN or Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN is more profitable at $-1.58/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN or the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN or the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)?

The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S7-LN and Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)?

The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN runs at 258.2 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) runs at 67.0 J/TH — a difference of 191.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (258.2 vs 67.0 J/TH).