Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.5 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 1,450 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 126.1 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 3,800.0 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,947 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,005 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 27% better efficacité (91.7 vs 126.1 J/TH) in the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)'s favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 4% more hashrate (12.0 vs 11.5 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 24% better power draw (1,100 vs 1,450 W)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 27% better efficacité (91.7 vs 126.1 J/TH)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 100% better weight (3.5 vs 3,800.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 32% more heat output (3,753 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 68% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $955 |
| -$2.21 | Daily net profit | -$3.07 |
| -$1,156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,075 |
| -$1,963 | Net after 2 years | -$3,194 |
| -$2,769 | Net after 3 years | -$4,314 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)91.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.21/day compared to $-3.07/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH — a difference of 34.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 27% better efficacité (91.7 vs 126.1 J/TH).