Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer T17+

Antminer T17+

Taux de hachage 64.0 TH/s Puissance 3,200 W Efficiency 50.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 39T

Innosilicon T3 39T

Taux de hachage 39.0 TH/s Puissance 2,150 W Efficiency 55.1 J/TH

Antminer T17+ vs Innosilicon T3 39T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer T17+ Specification Innosilicon T3 39T
64.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 39.0 TH/s
3,200 W Consommation électrique 2,150 W
50.0 J/TH Efficiency 55.1 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
10.0 kg Weight 8,650.0 kg
10,918 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,336 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer T17+

Daily Revenue 0.00002945 BTC $2.30
Daily Electricity -$7.68
Daily Profit -$5.38
Monthly -$161.28
Yearly -$1,962.18

Innosilicon T3 39T

Daily Revenue 0.00001795 BTC $1.40
Daily Electricity -$5.16
Daily Profit -$3.76
Monthly -$112.68
Yearly -$1,370.91

Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer T17+, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 64% more hashrate (64.0 vs 39.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon T3 39T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer T17+ — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer T17+ and Innosilicon T3 39T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer T17+ 64% more hashrate (64.0 vs 39.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon T3 39T 33% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,150 W)
  • Antminer T17+ 9% better efficacité (50.0 vs 55.1 J/TH)
  • Antminer T17+ 100% better weight (10.0 vs 8,650.0 kg)
  • Antminer T17+ 49% more heat output (10,918 vs 7,336 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer T17+ 223% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 26.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer T17+

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T17+

50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer T17+ or the Innosilicon T3 39T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon T3 39T is more profitable at $-3.76/day compared to $-5.38/day for the Antminer T17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer T17+ vs Innosilicon T3 39T: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Antminer T17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 39T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer T17+ or Innosilicon T3 39T?

The Antminer T17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T3 39T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer T17+ and Innosilicon T3 39T?

The Antminer T17+ runs at 50.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 39T runs at 55.1 J/TH — a difference of 5.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficacité (50.0 vs 55.1 J/TH).