Antminer AL1 vs Antminer T17+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Antminer T17+ |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 64.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Antminer T17+
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer T17+ l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 76% better efficacité (210.0 vs 50.0 J/TH) in the Antminer T17+'s favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Antminer T17+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer T17+ 300% more hashrate (16.0 vs 64.0 TH/s)
- Antminer T17+ 5% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,200 W)
- Antminer T17+ 76% better efficacité (210.0 vs 50.0 J/TH)
- Antminer T17+ 31% better weight (14.5 vs 10.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 5% more heat output (11,464 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T17+ 133% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Antminer T17+ |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$5.38 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$1,962 |
| -$15,466 | Net after 2 years | -$3,924 |
| -$18,199 | Net after 3 years | -$5,887 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer T17+50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer AL1 or Antminer T17+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer T17+ is more profitable at $-5.38/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer T17+: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Antminer T17+?
The Antminer T17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer T17+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer T17+ runs at 50.0 J/TH — a difference of 160.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (210.0 vs 50.0 J/TH).