Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd vs Canaan Avalon Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd | Specification | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| 235.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 5,170 W | Consommation électrique | 1,674 W |
| 22.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.6 J/TH |
| 30 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 15.4 kg | Weight | 10.5 kg |
| 17,640 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,712 BTU/hr |
| 51/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd
Canaan Avalon Q
Based on BTC price of $76,812 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Canaan Avalon Q, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 68% better power draw (5,170 vs 1,674 W). The Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd holds the edge in hashrate and niveau sonore and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd and Canaan Avalon Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd 161% more hashrate (235.0 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Q 68% better power draw (5,170 vs 1,674 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 15% better efficacité (22.0 vs 18.6 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd 33% better noise (30.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Canaan Avalon Q 32% better weight (15.4 vs 10.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd 209% more heat output (17,640 vs 5,712 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Q 10% more score de minage domestique (51.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd | Metric | Canaan Avalon Q |
|---|---|---|
| $2,599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,292 |
| -$4.10 | Daily net profit | -$0.84 |
| -$4,096 | Net after 1 year | -$1,597 |
| -$5,593 | Net after 2 years | -$1,902 |
| -$7,090 | Net after 3 years | -$2,207 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon QScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd or Canaan Avalon Q more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Q is more profitable at $-0.84/day compared to $-4.10/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd or Canaan Avalon Q?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon Q at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd or Canaan Avalon Q?
The Canaan Avalon Q scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 51/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd and Canaan Avalon Q?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd runs at 22.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH — a difference of 3.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficacité (22.0 vs 18.6 J/TH).