Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 vs Whatsminer M60S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 | Specification | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 186.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 3,480 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 11,400.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,874 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066
Whatsminer M60S
Based on BTC price of $77,884 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M60S edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 272% more hashrate (50.0 vs 186.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 and Whatsminer M60S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M60S 272% more hashrate (50.0 vs 186.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 7% better power draw (3,250 vs 3,480 W)
- Whatsminer M60S 71% better efficacité (65.0 vs 18.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M60S 100% better weight (11,400.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M60S 7% more heat output (11,089 vs 11,874 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M60S 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 | Metric | Whatsminer M60S |
|---|---|---|
| $1,255 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,500 |
| -$6.01 | Daily net profit | -$1.69 |
| -$3,448 | Net after 1 year | -$6,115 |
| -$5,641 | Net after 2 years | -$6,730 |
| -$7,834 | Net after 3 years | -$7,346 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M60SScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M60S18.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 vs Whatsminer M60S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M60S is more profitable at $-1.69/day compared to $-6.01/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 or the Whatsminer M60S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M60S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 vs Whatsminer M60S: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M60S scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1066). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 vs Whatsminer M60S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 1066 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M60S runs at 18.7 J/TH — a difference of 46.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (65.0 vs 18.7 J/TH).