Bitaxe GT vs FluMiner T3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe GT | Specification | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 115.0 TH/s |
| 75 W | Consommation électrique | 1,700 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.8 J/TH |
| 42 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 0.4 kg | Weight | 12.6 kg |
| 256 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,800 BTU/hr |
| 64/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | FluMiner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe GT
FluMiner T3
Based on BTC price of $78,274 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the FluMiner T3 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 2200% more hashrate (5.0 vs 115.0 TH/s) in the FluMiner T3's favour. The Bitaxe GT holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitaxe GT and FluMiner T3 sit on each measurable spec:
- FluMiner T3 2200% more hashrate (5.0 vs 115.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe GT 96% better power draw (75.0 vs 1,700.0 W)
- FluMiner T3 1% better efficacité (15.0 vs 14.8 J/TH)
- Bitaxe GT 16% better noise (42.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitaxe GT 97% better weight (0.4 vs 12.6 kg)
- FluMiner T3 2167% more heat output (256 vs 5,800 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe GT 14% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitaxe GT | Metric | FluMiner T3 |
|---|---|---|
| $499 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,601 |
| $0.00 | Daily net profit | $0.06 |
| -$499 | Net after 1 year | -$1,578 |
| -$499 | Net after 2 years | -$1,555 |
| -$499 | Net after 3 years | -$1,533 |
| Takes ~13,418.4 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Takes ~70.3 years to pay back at current rates |
At the default rate, the FluMiner T3 reaches break-even first — but plug in your own electricity cost above, since payback shifts sharply with it.
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
FluMiner T3$0.06/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GTScore: 64/100. 42 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
FluMiner T314.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitaxe GT or the FluMiner T3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the FluMiner T3 is more profitable at $0.06/day compared to $0.00/day for the Bitaxe GT. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitaxe GT or FluMiner T3?
The Bitaxe GT is quieter at 42 dB compared to the FluMiner T3 at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitaxe GT vs FluMiner T3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe GT scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the FluMiner T3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitaxe GT and FluMiner T3?
The Bitaxe GT runs at 15.0 J/TH while the FluMiner T3 runs at 14.8 J/TH — a difference of 0.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficacité (15.0 vs 14.8 J/TH).