Goldshell CK Box II vs Goldshell CK5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK Box II | Specification | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.0 TH/s |
| 400 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 190.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 200.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,365 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK Box II
Goldshell CK5
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK Box II comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 83% better power draw (400 vs 2,400 W). The Goldshell CK5 holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell CK Box II and Goldshell CK5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK5 471% more hashrate (2.1 vs 12.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Box II 83% better power draw (400 vs 2,400 W)
- Goldshell CK Box II 5% better efficacité (190 vs 200 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK Box II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK5 500% more heat output (1,365 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK Box II 31% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell CK Box II | Metric | Goldshell CK5 |
|---|---|---|
| $246 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $998 |
| -$0.88 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$569 | Net after 1 year | -$2,943 |
| -$892 | Net after 2 years | -$4,888 |
| -$1,214 | Net after 3 years | -$6,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK Box IIScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Box II190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK Box II or the Goldshell CK5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Box II is more profitable at $-0.88/day compared to $-5.33/day for the Goldshell CK5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK Box II or Goldshell CK5?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell CK Box II vs Goldshell CK5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK Box II scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell CK5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell CK Box II vs Goldshell CK5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell CK Box II runs at 190.5 J/TH while the Goldshell CK5 runs at 200.0 J/TH — a difference of 9.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficacité (190 vs 200 J/TH).