StrongU Hornbill H8 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| StrongU Hornbill H8 | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| 74.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 262.0 TH/s |
| 3,330 W | Consommation électrique | 3,799 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 11,500.0 kg | Weight | 25.5 kg |
| 11,362 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,962 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| StrongU | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
StrongU Hornbill H8
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 254% more hashrate (74.0 vs 262.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72's favour. That said, the StrongU Hornbill H8 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the StrongU Hornbill H8 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 sit on each measurable spec:
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 254% more hashrate (74.0 vs 262.0 TH/s)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 12% better power draw (3,330 vs 3,799 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 68% better efficacité (45.0 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 100% better weight (11,500.0 vs 25.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 14% more heat output (11,362 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| StrongU Hornbill H8 | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.33 | Daily net profit | $0.31 |
| -$3,145 | Net after 1 year | +$112 |
| -$5,091 | Net after 2 years | +$225 |
| -$7,036 | Net after 3 years | +$337 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72$5.64/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7214.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
StrongU Hornbill H8 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is more profitable at $0.31/day compared to $-5.33/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the StrongU Hornbill H8 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the StrongU Hornbill H8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
StrongU Hornbill H8 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: which fits a residential setup better?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the StrongU Hornbill H8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the StrongU Hornbill H8 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 on J/TH?
The StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 30.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (45.0 vs 14.5 J/TH).