Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Taux de hachage 2,000.0 MH/s Puissance 2,500 W Efficiency 1,250,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo X1

iPollo X1

Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs iPollo X1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro Specification iPollo X1
2,000.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s
2,500 W Consommation électrique 240 W
1,250,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
22.0 kg Weight 1.5 kg
8,530 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
40/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.00
Daily Profit -$6.00
Monthly -$180.00
Yearly -$2,189.97

iPollo X1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo X1 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 90% better power draw (2,500 vs 240 W). The Innosilicon A11 Pro holds the edge in hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo X1 — l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A11 Pro and iPollo X1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo X1 90% better power draw (2,500 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo X1 36% better efficacité (1,250,000 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo X1 93% better weight (22.0 vs 1.5 kg)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 942% more heat output (8,530 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro 29% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro Metric iPollo X1
$4,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $444
-$6.00 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$6,190 Net after 1 year -$654
-$8,380 Net after 2 years -$864
-$10,570 Net after 3 years -$1,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A11 Pro

Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo X1

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs iPollo X1: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro or the iPollo X1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo X1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A11 Pro or the iPollo X1?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo X1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon A11 Pro vs iPollo X1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro runs at 1,250,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 450,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficacité (1,250,000 vs 800,000 J/TH).