Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell KD Max

Goldshell KD Max

Taux de hachage 40.2 TH/s Puissance 3,350 W Efficiency 83.3 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KD6

Goldshell KD6

Taux de hachage 29.2 TH/s Puissance 2,630 W Efficiency 90.1 J/TH

Goldshell KD Max vs Goldshell KD6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell KD Max Specification Goldshell KD6
40.2 TH/s Taux de hachage 29.2 TH/s
3,350 W Consommation électrique 2,630 W
83.3 J/TH Efficiency 90.1 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
8,500.0 kg Weight 8,500.0 kg
11,430 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,974 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Blake2s Algorithme Blake2s
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell KD Max

Daily Revenue 0.00001850 BTC $1.42
Daily Electricity -$8.04
Daily Profit -$6.62
Monthly -$198.52
Yearly -$2,415.27

Goldshell KD6

Daily Revenue 0.00001344 BTC $1.03
Daily Electricity -$6.31
Daily Profit -$5.28
Monthly -$158.36
Yearly -$1,926.65

Based on BTC price of $76,912 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell KD Max comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 38% more hashrate (40.2 vs 29.2 TH/s). The Goldshell KD6 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell KD Max — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell KD Max and Goldshell KD6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell KD Max 38% more hashrate (40.2 vs 29.2 TH/s)
  • Goldshell KD6 21% better power draw (3,350 vs 2,630 W)
  • Goldshell KD Max 7% better efficacité (83.3 vs 90.1 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KD Max 27% more heat output (11,430 vs 8,974 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Goldshell KD Max Metric Goldshell KD6
$1,320 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,027
-$6.62 Daily net profit -$5.28
-$3,735 Net after 1 year -$2,954
-$6,151 Net after 2 years -$4,880
-$8,566 Net after 3 years -$6,807
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell KD Max

83.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell KD Max or Goldshell KD6 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD6 is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-6.62/day for the Goldshell KD Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell KD Max or the Goldshell KD6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell KD Max or the Goldshell KD6?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Goldshell KD Max and Goldshell KD6 on J/TH?

The Goldshell KD Max runs at 83.3 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6 runs at 90.1 J/TH — a difference of 6.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (83.3 vs 90.1 J/TH).