iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4 3U-Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 840.0 MH/s |
| 1,240 W | Consommation électrique | 340 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 404,761.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 12.0 kg |
| 4,231 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,160 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Classic
Jasminer X4 3U-Z
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X4 3U-Z, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 73% better power draw (1,240 vs 340 W). That said, the iPollo V1 Classic isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Classic and Jasminer X4 3U-Z sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo V1 Classic 85% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 73% better power draw (1,240 vs 340 W)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 49% better efficacité (800,000 vs 404,762 J/TH)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 12.0 kg)
- iPollo V1 Classic 265% more heat output (4,231 vs 1,160 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4 3U-Z 10% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4 3U-Z |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,299 |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$0.82 |
| -$1,455 | Net after 1 year | -$1,597 |
| -$2,541 | Net after 2 years | -$1,895 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 3 years | -$2,192 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4 3U-ZScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4 3U-Z404,761.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Classic or Jasminer X4 3U-Z more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4 3U-Z is more profitable at $-0.82/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Classic or Jasminer X4 3U-Z?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X4 3U-Z scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4 3U-Z: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 3U-Z runs at 404,761.9 J/TH — a difference of 395,238.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficacité (800,000 vs 404,762 J/TH).