iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4-C 1U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4-C 1U |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 450.0 MH/s |
| 1,240 W | Consommation électrique | 240 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 533,333.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,231 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Classic
Jasminer X4-C 1U
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Jasminer X4-C 1U l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 81% better power draw (1,240 vs 240 W). That said, the iPollo V1 Classic isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Classic and Jasminer X4-C 1U sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo V1 Classic 244% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4-C 1U 81% better power draw (1,240 vs 240 W)
- Jasminer X4-C 1U 33% better efficacité (800,000 vs 533,333 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Classic 417% more heat output (4,231 vs 819 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4-C 1U |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $658 |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$1,455 | Net after 1 year | -$868 |
| -$2,541 | Net after 2 years | -$1,078 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 3 years | -$1,289 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4-C 1U533,333.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Classic vs Jasminer X4-C 1U: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-C 1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Classic or Jasminer X4-C 1U?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Classic or the Jasminer X4-C 1U?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Classic and Jasminer X4-C 1U on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-C 1U runs at 533,333.3 J/TH — a difference of 266,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (800,000 vs 533,333 J/TH).