iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Specification | Jasminer X4-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 130.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 GH/s |
| 104 W | Consommation électrique | 370 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 355,769.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 355 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,262 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic
Jasminer X4-Q
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X4-Q, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 700% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic and Jasminer X4-Q diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X4-Q 700% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 72% better power draw (104 vs 370 W)
- Jasminer X4-Q 56% better efficacité (800,000 vs 355,769 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic 90% better weight (1,000 vs 10,000 kg)
- Jasminer X4-Q 256% more heat output (355 vs 1,262 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4-Q 13% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic | Metric | Jasminer X4-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $285 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $210 |
| -$0.25 | Daily net profit | -$0.89 |
| -$376 | Net after 1 year | -$534 |
| -$467 | Net after 2 years | -$858 |
| -$558 | Net after 3 years | -$1,182 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4-QScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4-Q355,769.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4-Q: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic is more profitable at $-0.25/day compared to $-0.89/day for the Jasminer X4-Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4-Q: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic or Jasminer X4-Q?
The Jasminer X4-Q scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic vs Jasminer X4-Q: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-Q runs at 355,769.2 J/TH — a difference of 444,230.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (800,000 vs 355,769 J/TH).