Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 26.0 TH/s |
| 750 W | Power Consumption | 2,100 W |
| 1,500,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 9,000.0 kg |
| 2,559 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,165 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T
Based on BTC price of $79,091 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 5199900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 26.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T's favour. That said, the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T 5199900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 26.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 64% better power draw (750 vs 2,100 W)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T 100% better efficiency (1,500,000.0 vs 80.8 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 10% better weight (8,100 vs 9,000 kg)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T 180% more heat output (2,559 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 15% more home mining score (30.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) | Metric | Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T |
|---|---|---|
| $2,150 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $338 |
| -$1.80 | Daily net profit | -$4.09 |
| -$2,807 | Net after 1 year | -$1,832 |
| -$3,464 | Net after 2 years | -$3,326 |
| -$4,121 | Net after 3 years | -$4,821 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T80.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) is more profitable at $-1.80/day compared to $-4.09/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T?
The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T on J/TH?
The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) runs at 1,500,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 26T runs at 80.8 J/TH — a difference of 1,499,919.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,500,000.0 vs 80.8 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster