Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) | Specification | Innosilicon A11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 500.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2,000.0 MH/s |
| 750 W | Power Consumption | 2,500 W |
| 1,500,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,250,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 22.0 kg |
| 2,559 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,530 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 40/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
Innosilicon A11 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon A11 Pro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon A11 Pro's favour. The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon A11 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 70% better power draw (750 vs 2,500 W)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 17% better efficiency (1,500,000 vs 1,250,000 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 22.0 kg)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 233% more heat output (2,559 vs 8,530 BTU/hr)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro 33% more home mining score (30.0 vs 40.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) | Metric | Innosilicon A11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $2,150 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,000 |
| -$1.80 | Daily net profit | -$6.00 |
| -$2,807 | Net after 1 year | -$6,190 |
| -$3,464 | Net after 2 years | -$8,380 |
| -$4,121 | Net after 3 years | -$10,570 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon A11 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Innosilicon A11 Pro1,250,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) is more profitable at $-1.80/day compared to $-6.00/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) or the Innosilicon A11 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) runs at 1,500,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon A11 Pro runs at 1,250,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 250,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 17% better efficiency (1,500,000 vs 1,250,000 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster