Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 96.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 2,832 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,663 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,065 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th), which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 86% better efficiency (210.0 vs 29.5 J/TH). That said, the Antminer AL1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) 500% more hashrate (16.0 vs 96.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) 16% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,832 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) 86% better efficiency (210.0 vs 29.5 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 14,200.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 19% more heat output (11,464 vs 9,663 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $550 |
| -$7.48 | Daily net profit | -$3.30 |
| -$12,731 | Net after 1 year | -$1,756 |
| -$15,462 | Net after 2 years | -$2,962 |
| -$18,193 | Net after 3 years | -$4,168 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)29.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) is more profitable at $-3.30/day compared to $-7.48/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (96Th) runs at 29.5 J/TH — a difference of 180.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (210.0 vs 29.5 J/TH).