Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

Hashrate 19.3 GH/s Power 1,350 W Efficiency 69,948.2 J/TH
VS
Baikal Giant+ A2000

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Hashrate 2.0 GH/s Power 450 W Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) vs Baikal Giant+ A2000

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) Specification Baikal Giant+ A2000
19.3 GH/s Hashrate 2.0 GH/s
1,350 W Power Consumption 450 W
69,948.2 J/TH Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
5,500.0 kg Weight 2,980.0 kg
4,606 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,535 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm X11
Bitmain Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$3.24
Monthly -$97.18
Yearly -$1,182.35

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.08
Daily Profit -$1.08
Monthly -$32.40
Yearly -$394.17

Based on BTC price of $77,929 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 865% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) and Baikal Giant+ A2000 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) 865% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 67% better power draw (1,350 vs 450 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) 69% better efficiency (69,948 vs 225,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 46% better weight (5,500 vs 2,980 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) 200% more heat output (4,606 vs 1,535 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 10% more home mining score (31.0 vs 34.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)

69,948.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) or the Baikal Giant+ A2000?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 is more profitable at $-1.08/day compared to $-3.24/day for the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) or the Baikal Giant+ A2000?

The Baikal Giant+ A2000 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) and Baikal Giant+ A2000 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer D3 (19.3Gh) runs at 69,948.2 J/TH while the Baikal Giant+ A2000 runs at 225,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 155,051.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (69,948 vs 225,000 J/TH).