Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 95.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 14,500.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,183 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 2581422% more hashrate (0.0 vs 95.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)'s favour. That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 2581422% more hashrate (0.0 vs 95.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 32% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,250 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 34.2 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 14,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 48% more heat output (7,506 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 82% more home mining score (40.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $215 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$4.23 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,759 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$3,303 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$4,847 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) is more profitable at $-4.23/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH — a difference of 597,791.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 34.2 J/TH).