Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X44-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 23.4 GH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,550 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 108,974.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 15.7 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,701 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Jasminer X44-P
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X44-P comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 536% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Jasminer X44-P sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X44-P 536% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 14% better power draw (2,200 vs 2,550 W)
- Jasminer X44-P 82% better efficiency (597,826 vs 108,974 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Antminer E9 Pro 10% better weight (14.2 vs 15.7 kg)
- Jasminer X44-P 16% more heat output (7,506 vs 8,701 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 38% more home mining score (40.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,580 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$6.12 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$7,813 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$10,047 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$12,280 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X44-P108,974.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Jasminer X44-P more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer E9 Pro is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-6.12/day for the Jasminer X44-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or Jasminer X44-P?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Jasminer X44-P at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X44-P: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Jasminer X44-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Jasminer X44-P: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Jasminer X44-P runs at 108,974.4 J/TH — a difference of 488,851.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (597,826 vs 108,974 J/TH).