Jasminer X16-QE vs Jasminer X44-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-QE | Specification | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8 GH/s | Hashrate | 23.4 GH/s |
| 550 W | Power Consumption | 2,550 W |
| 314,285.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 108,974.4 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 15.7 kg |
| 1,877 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,701 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-QE
Jasminer X44-P
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X44-P edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 1237% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Jasminer X16-QE isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Jasminer X16-QE and Jasminer X44-P actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Jasminer X44-P 1237% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-QE 78% better power draw (550 vs 2,550 W)
- Jasminer X44-P 65% better efficiency (314,286 vs 108,974 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-QE 50% better noise (40.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Jasminer X16-QE 36% better weight (10.0 vs 15.7 kg)
- Jasminer X44-P 364% more heat output (1,877 vs 8,701 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-QE 124% more home mining score (65.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Jasminer X16-QE | Metric | Jasminer X44-P |
|---|---|---|
| $469 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,580 |
| -$1.32 | Daily net profit | -$6.12 |
| -$951 | Net after 1 year | -$7,813 |
| -$1,433 | Net after 2 years | -$10,047 |
| -$1,914 | Net after 3 years | -$12,280 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QEScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X44-P108,974.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Jasminer X16-QE vs Jasminer X44-P: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-QE is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-6.12/day for the Jasminer X44-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Jasminer X16-QE or the Jasminer X44-P better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-QE is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X44-P at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Jasminer X16-QE or the Jasminer X44-P?
The Jasminer X16-QE scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Jasminer X44-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Jasminer X16-QE and Jasminer X44-P?
The Jasminer X16-QE runs at 314,285.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X44-P runs at 108,974.4 J/TH — a difference of 205,311.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficiency (314,286 vs 108,974 J/TH).