Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 500.0 TH/s |
| 2,880 W | Power Consumption | 8,400 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 16.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 10,500.0 kg | Weight | 20.0 kg |
| 9,827 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 28,661 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 681% more hashrate (64.0 vs 500.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 681% more hashrate (64.0 vs 500.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 66% better power draw (2,880 vs 8,400 W)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 63% better efficiency (45.0 vs 16.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 100% better weight (10,500.0 vs 20.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 192% more heat output (9,827 vs 28,661 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T 132% more home mining score (22.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T |
|---|---|---|
| $5,149 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.58 | Daily net profit | -$1.95 |
| -$6,821 | Net after 1 year | -$712 |
| -$8,493 | Net after 2 years | -$1,423 |
| -$10,165 | Net after 3 years | -$2,135 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500TScore: 51/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T is more profitable at $-1.95/day compared to $-4.58/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T?
The Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A1566HA 500T runs at 16.8 J/TH — a difference of 28.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (45.0 vs 16.8 J/TH).