Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S19 Hydro

Antminer S19 Hydro

Hashrate 158.0 TH/s Power 5,451 W Efficiency 34.5 J/TH
VS
Holic H28

Holic H28

Hashrate 28.0 TH/s Power 2,100 W Efficiency 75.0 J/TH

Antminer S19 Hydro vs Holic H28

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S19 Hydro Specification Holic H28
158.0 TH/s Hashrate 28.0 TH/s
5,451 W Power Consumption 2,100 W
34.5 J/TH Efficiency 75.0 J/TH
50 dB Noise Level
15.2 kg Weight
18,599 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,165 BTU/hr
44/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Holic

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S19 Hydro

Daily Revenue 0.00007498 BTC $5.95
Daily Electricity -$13.08
Daily Profit -$7.13
Monthly -$213.92
Yearly -$2,602.70

Holic H28

Daily Revenue 0.00001329 BTC $1.05
Daily Electricity -$5.04
Daily Profit -$3.99
Monthly -$119.56
Yearly -$1,454.62

Based on BTC price of $79,379 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer S19 Hydro wins on 4 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 464% more hashrate (158.0 vs 28.0 TH/s). The Holic H28 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer S19 Hydro — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer S19 Hydro and Holic H28 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer S19 Hydro 464% more hashrate (158.0 vs 28.0 TH/s)
  • Holic H28 61% better power draw (5,451 vs 2,100 W)
  • Antminer S19 Hydro 54% better efficiency (34.5 vs 75.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer S19 Hydro 160% more heat output (18,599 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S19 Hydro 69% more home mining score (44.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer S19 Hydro Metric Holic H28
$5,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.13 Daily net profit -$3.99
-$7,603 Net after 1 year -$1,455
-$10,205 Net after 2 years -$2,909
-$12,808 Net after 3 years -$4,364
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S19 Hydro

Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S19 Hydro

34.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer S19 Hydro or Holic H28 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Holic H28 is more profitable at $-3.99/day compared to $-7.13/day for the Antminer S19 Hydro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer S19 Hydro or Holic H28?

The Antminer S19 Hydro is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Holic H28 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S19 Hydro or Holic H28?

The Antminer S19 Hydro scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Holic H28). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S19 Hydro and Holic H28?

The Antminer S19 Hydro runs at 34.5 J/TH while the Holic H28 runs at 75.0 J/TH — a difference of 40.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficiency (34.5 vs 75.0 J/TH).