Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 100.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 11.5 TH/s |
| 3,050 W | Power Consumption | 1,450 W |
| 30.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 126.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 3,800.0 kg |
| 10,407 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,947 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,088 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 770% more hashrate (100.0 vs 11.5 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) and Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) 770% more hashrate (100.0 vs 11.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 52% better power draw (3,050 vs 1,450 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) 76% better efficiency (30.5 vs 126.1 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 71% better weight (13,200 vs 3,800 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) 110% more heat output (10,407 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) 41% more home mining score (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $600 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $955 |
| -$3.68 | Daily net profit | -$3.06 |
| -$1,943 | Net after 1 year | -$2,072 |
| -$3,287 | Net after 2 years | -$3,190 |
| -$4,630 | Net after 3 years | -$4,307 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)30.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.06/day compared to $-3.68/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) or Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) and Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) runs at 30.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T9 (11.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH — a difference of 95.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficiency (30.5 vs 126.1 J/TH).