Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 100.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Power Consumption | 3,050 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 13,200.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,407 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,027 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th), which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 5550% more hashrate (1.8 vs 100.0 TH/s). The Antminer D9 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) 5550% more hashrate (1.8 vs 100.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 7% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,050 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) 98% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 30.5 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 100% better weight (16.1 vs 13,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) 7% more heat output (9,687 vs 10,407 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $600 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$3.68 |
| -$5,463 | Net after 1 year | -$1,944 |
| -$7,927 | Net after 2 years | -$3,289 |
| -$10,390 | Net after 3 years | -$4,633 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)30.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) is more profitable at $-3.68/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th)?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro (100Th) runs at 30.5 J/TH — a difference of 1,573.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 30.5 J/TH).