Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S5 |
|---|---|---|
| 358.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 1.2 TH/s |
| 5,370 W | Power Consumption | 590 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 510.8 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | — |
| 18,322 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,013 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th)
Bitmain Antminer S5
Based on BTC price of $79,123 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 30896% more hashrate (358.0 vs 1.2 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S5 holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) and Bitmain Antminer S5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 30896% more hashrate (358.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S5 89% better power draw (5,370 vs 590 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 97% better efficiency (15.0 vs 510.8 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 810% more heat output (18,322 vs 2,013 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) 47% more home mining score (44.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S5 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,757 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| $0.15 | Daily net profit | -$1.37 |
| -$2,703 | Net after 1 year | -$501 |
| -$2,650 | Net after 2 years | -$1,003 |
| -$2,596 | Net after 3 years | -$1,504 |
| Takes ~51.3 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th)$1.52/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th)15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) is more profitable at $0.15/day compared to $-1.37/day for the Bitmain Antminer S5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) or Bitmain Antminer S5?
The Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) and Bitmain Antminer S5?
The Bitmain Antminer S21+ Hyd (358Th) runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S5 runs at 510.8 J/TH — a difference of 495.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficiency (15.0 vs 510.8 J/TH).