Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| 442.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 5,304 W | Power Consumption | 1,077 W |
| 12.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 17.2 kg | Weight | — |
| 18,097 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,675 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th)
Ebang Ebit E9
Based on BTC price of $79,244 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 6916% more hashrate (442.0 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th)'s favour. That said, the Ebang Ebit E9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) and Ebang Ebit E9 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) 6916% more hashrate (442.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9 80% better power draw (5,304 vs 1,077 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) 93% better efficiency (12.0 vs 171.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) 392% more heat output (18,097 vs 3,675 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) 42% more home mining score (44.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| $8,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $370 |
| $3.89 | Daily net profit | -$2.35 |
| -$7,379 | Net after 1 year | -$1,227 |
| -$5,959 | Net after 2 years | -$2,084 |
| -$4,538 | Net after 3 years | -$2,941 |
| Takes ~6.2 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th)$6.24/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th)12.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) or Ebang Ebit E9 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) is more profitable at $3.89/day compared to $-2.35/day for the Ebang Ebit E9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) or the Ebang Ebit E9 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) or Ebang Ebit E9?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) and Ebang Ebit E9?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) runs at 12.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 159.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 93% better efficiency (12.0 vs 171.0 J/TH).
Compare Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) with...
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) vs Antminer AL1
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) vs Antminer D7
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) vs Antminer D9
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) vs Antminer E9 Pro
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) vs Antminer K7
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Immersion (442Th) vs Antminer KS3