Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Ebang Ebit E9

Ebang Ebit E9

Hashrate 6.3 TH/s Power 1,077 W Efficiency 171.0 J/TH
VS
Ebang Ebit E9.3

Ebang Ebit E9.3

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 1,760 W Efficiency 110.0 J/TH

Ebang Ebit E9 vs Ebang Ebit E9.3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Ebang Ebit E9 Specification Ebang Ebit E9.3
6.3 TH/s Hashrate 16.0 TH/s
1,077 W Power Consumption 1,760 W
171.0 J/TH Efficiency 110.0 J/TH
Noise Level
Weight 6,900.0 kg
3,675 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,005 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Ebang Manufacturer Ebang

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Ebang Ebit E9

Daily Revenue 0.00000290 BTC $0.23
Daily Electricity -$2.58
Daily Profit -$2.36
Monthly -$70.75
Yearly -$860.74

Ebang Ebit E9.3

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$4.22
Daily Profit -$3.65
Monthly -$109.45
Yearly -$1,331.69

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Ebang Ebit E9.3 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 154% more hashrate (6.3 vs 16.0 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Ebang Ebit E9.3 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Ebang Ebit E9 and Ebang Ebit E9.3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Ebang Ebit E9.3 154% more hashrate (6.3 vs 16.0 TH/s)
  • Ebang Ebit E9 39% better power draw (1,077 vs 1,760 W)
  • Ebang Ebit E9.3 36% better efficiency (171 vs 110 J/TH)
  • Ebang Ebit E9.3 63% more heat output (3,675 vs 6,005 BTU/hr)
  • Ebang Ebit E9 11% more home mining score (31.0 vs 28.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Ebang Ebit E9 Metric Ebang Ebit E9.3
$370 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.36 Daily net profit -$3.65
-$1,231 Net after 1 year -$1,332
-$2,091 Net after 2 years -$2,663
-$2,952 Net after 3 years -$3,995
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Ebang Ebit E9

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Ebang Ebit E9.3

110.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Ebang Ebit E9 or the Ebang Ebit E9.3?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-3.65/day for the Ebang Ebit E9.3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Ebang Ebit E9 or Ebang Ebit E9.3?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Ebang Ebit E9 or Ebang Ebit E9.3?

The Ebang Ebit E9 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Ebang Ebit E9.3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Ebang Ebit E9 and Ebang Ebit E9.3?

The Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9.3 runs at 110.0 J/TH — a difference of 61.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficiency (171 vs 110 J/TH).