Bitmain Antminer S23 vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 318.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 40.0 TH/s |
| 3,498 W | Power Consumption | 2,200 W |
| 11.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 11,935 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23
Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 695% more hashrate (318.0 vs 40.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23's favour. The Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S23 and Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S23 695% more hashrate (318.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) 37% better power draw (3,498 vs 2,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 80% better efficiency (11.0 vs 55.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 100% better weight (14.5 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 59% more heat output (11,935 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 38% more home mining score (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $4,999 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $155 |
| $3.19 | Daily net profit | -$3.82 |
| -$3,836 | Net after 1 year | -$1,550 |
| -$2,673 | Net after 2 years | -$2,946 |
| -$1,510 | Net after 3 years | -$4,341 |
| Takes ~4.3 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23$7.01/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S2311.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 or Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 is more profitable at $3.19/day compared to $-3.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S23 or Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S23 or Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S23 vs Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 runs at 11.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T17 (40Th) runs at 55.0 J/TH — a difference of 44.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficiency (11.0 vs 55.0 J/TH).