Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer D9

Antminer D9

Hashrate 1,770.0 GH/s Power 2,839 W Efficiency 1,604.0 J/TH
VS
Bitmain Antminer S23

Bitmain Antminer S23

Hashrate 318.0 TH/s Power 3,498 W Efficiency 11.0 J/TH

Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S23

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D9 Specification Bitmain Antminer S23
1,770.0 GH/s Hashrate 318.0 TH/s
2,839 W Power Consumption 3,498 W
1,604.0 J/TH Efficiency 11.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
16.1 kg Weight 14.5 kg
9,687 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,935 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D9

Daily Revenue 0.00000081 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$6.81
Daily Profit -$6.75
Monthly -$202.50
Yearly -$2,463.72

Bitmain Antminer S23

Daily Revenue 0.00014634 BTC $11.44
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit $3.05
Monthly $91.39
Yearly $1,111.88

Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 17866% more hashrate (1.8 vs 318.0 TH/s). The Antminer D9 holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer S23 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S23 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Bitmain Antminer S23 17866% more hashrate (1.8 vs 318.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer D9 19% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,498 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 99% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 11.0 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 10% better weight (16.1 vs 14.5 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 23% more heat output (9,687 vs 11,935 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer D9 Metric Bitmain Antminer S23
$3,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $4,999
-$6.75 Daily net profit $3.05
-$5,464 Net after 1 year -$3,887
-$7,927 Net after 2 years -$2,775
-$10,391 Net after 3 years -$1,663
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Takes ~4.5 years to pay back at current rates

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitmain Antminer S23

$9.80/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer S23

11.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer S23?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 is more profitable at $3.05/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S23: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer S23: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer S23?

The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S23 runs at 11.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,593.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 11.0 J/TH).