Bitmain Antminer S23 vs PiAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S23 | Specification | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 318.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 500.0 GH/s |
| 3,498 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| 11.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 30 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 11,935 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S23
PiAxe
Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S23, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 63500% more hashrate (318.0 vs 0.5 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S23's favour. That said, the PiAxe isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S23 and PiAxe sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 63500% more hashrate (318.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- PiAxe 100% better power draw (3,498.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 63% better efficiency (11.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- PiAxe 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
- PiAxe 99% better weight (14.5 vs 0.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 23211% more heat output (11,935.2 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- PiAxe 94% more home mining score (36.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S23 | Metric | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| $4,999 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| $3.18 | Daily net profit | -$0.02 |
| -$3,840 | Net after 1 year | -$85 |
| -$2,681 | Net after 2 years | -$92 |
| -$1,522 | Net after 3 years | -$98 |
| Takes ~4.3 years to pay back at current rates | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23$3.19/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
PiAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S2311.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 or PiAxe more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 is more profitable at $3.18/day compared to $-0.02/day for the PiAxe. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 or the PiAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S23 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S23 vs PiAxe: which fits a residential setup better?
The PiAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S23). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23 and PiAxe on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 runs at 11.0 J/TH while the PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 19.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficiency (11.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).