Bitmain Antminer S5 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S5 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 TH/s | Hashrate | 13.5 TH/s |
| 590 W | Power Consumption | 1,323 W |
| 510.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| — | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 2,013 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,514 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S5
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score). The standout gap is 1069% more hashrate (1.2 vs 13.5 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer S5 claws back ground on power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S5 and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 1069% more hashrate (1.2 vs 13.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S5 55% better power draw (590 vs 1,323 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 81% better efficiency (510.8 vs 98.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 124% more heat output (2,013 vs 4,514 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 3% more home mining score (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S5 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$1.37 | Daily net profit | -$2.68 |
| -$502 | Net after 1 year | -$1,045 |
| -$1,003 | Net after 2 years | -$2,024 |
| -$1,505 | Net after 3 years | -$3,004 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)98.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S5 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S5 is more profitable at $-1.37/day compared to $-2.68/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S5 or Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S5 or Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S5 and Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S5 runs at 510.8 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH — a difference of 412.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (510.8 vs 98.0 J/TH).