Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| 13.5 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.3 TH/s |
| 1,323 W | Power Consumption | 1,077 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,514 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,675 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)
Ebang Ebit E9
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 114% more hashrate (13.5 vs 6.3 TH/s). That said, the Ebang Ebit E9 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) and Ebang Ebit E9 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 114% more hashrate (13.5 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9 19% better power draw (1,323 vs 1,077 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 43% better efficiency (98.0 vs 171.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) 23% more heat output (4,514 vs 3,675 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $370 |
| -$2.68 | Daily net profit | -$2.36 |
| -$1,045 | Net after 1 year | -$1,230 |
| -$2,024 | Net after 2 years | -$2,090 |
| -$3,004 | Net after 3 years | -$2,949 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th)98.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) or Ebang Ebit E9 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E9 is more profitable at $-2.36/day compared to $-2.68/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) or the Ebang Ebit E9 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 73.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficiency (98.0 vs 171.0 J/TH).