Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Canaan Avalon A16
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 282.0 TH/s |
| 1,372 W | Power Consumption | 3,900 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.8 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 4,681 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,307 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Canaan Avalon A16
Based on BTC price of $79,143 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A16 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 1914% more hashrate (14.0 vs 282.0 TH/s) in the Canaan Avalon A16's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Canaan Avalon A16 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A16 1914% more hashrate (14.0 vs 282.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 65% better power draw (1,372 vs 3,900 W)
- Canaan Avalon A16 86% better efficiency (98.0 vs 13.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A16 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A16 184% more heat output (4,681 vs 13,307 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon A16 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,202 |
| -$2.78 | Daily net profit | $0.91 |
| -$1,081 | Net after 1 year | -$3,870 |
| -$2,097 | Net after 2 years | -$3,537 |
| -$3,112 | Net after 3 years | -$3,205 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Takes ~12.6 years to pay back at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Canaan Avalon A16$3.69/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A1613.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or Canaan Avalon A16 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A16 is more profitable at $0.91/day compared to $-2.78/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Canaan Avalon A16: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A16 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or Canaan Avalon A16?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A16). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Canaan Avalon A16?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A16 runs at 13.8 J/TH — a difference of 84.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficiency (98.0 vs 13.8 J/TH).