Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs StealthMiner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Specification | StealthMiner |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 800.0 GH/s |
| 1,280 W | Power Consumption | 18 W |
| 80.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 28 dB |
| 4,560.0 kg | Weight | 1.5 kg |
| 4,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 61 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
StealthMiner
Based on BTC price of $79,113 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the StealthMiner, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better power draw (1,280.0 vs 18.0 W). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and StealthMiner sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 1900% more hashrate (16.0 vs 0.8 TH/s)
- StealthMiner 99% better power draw (1,280.0 vs 18.0 W)
- StealthMiner 72% better efficiency (80.0 vs 22.5 J/TH)
- StealthMiner 100% better weight (4,560.0 vs 1.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 7013% more heat output (4,367.4 vs 61.4 BTU/hr)
- StealthMiner 126% more home mining score (31.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Metric | StealthMiner |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$2.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$909 | Net after 1 year | -$204 |
| -$1,817 | Net after 2 years | -$209 |
| -$2,726 | Net after 3 years | -$214 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
StealthMinerScore: 70/100. 28 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StealthMiner22.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the StealthMiner?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StealthMiner is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-2.49/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or StealthMiner?
The StealthMiner is quieter at 28 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs StealthMiner: which fits a residential setup better?
The StealthMiner scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and StealthMiner on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the StealthMiner runs at 22.5 J/TH — a difference of 57.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficiency (80.0 vs 22.5 J/TH).