Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 262.0 TH/s |
| 1,280 W | Power Consumption | 3,799 W |
| 80.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4,560.0 kg | Weight | 25.5 kg |
| 4,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,962 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
Based on BTC price of $79,032 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 1538% more hashrate (16.0 vs 262.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 1538% more hashrate (16.0 vs 262.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 66% better power draw (1,280 vs 3,799 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 82% better efficiency (80.0 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 99% better weight (4,560.0 vs 25.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 197% more heat output (4,367 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72$2.90/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7214.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is more profitable at $0.41/day compared to $-2.49/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 65.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (80.0 vs 14.5 J/TH).