Antminer S9 vs Canaan Avalon A15-194T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S9 | Specification | Canaan Avalon A15-194T |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 194.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 3,647 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.8 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 12.8 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,444 BTU/hr |
| 83/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S9
Canaan Avalon A15-194T
Based on BTC price of $79,066 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A15-194T comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 1286% more hashrate (14.0 vs 194.0 TH/s). The Antminer S9 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S9 and Canaan Avalon A15-194T sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 1286% more hashrate (14.0 vs 194.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S9 63% better power draw (1,350 vs 3,647 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 81% better efficiency (96.4 vs 18.8 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 1% better noise (76.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer S9 67% better weight (4.2 vs 12.8 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A15-194T 170% more heat output (4,606 vs 12,444 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S9 177% more home mining score (83.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S9 | Metric | Canaan Avalon A15-194T |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,749 |
| -$2.73 | Daily net profit | -$1.69 |
| -$997 | Net after 1 year | -$3,367 |
| -$1,993 | Net after 2 years | -$3,986 |
| -$2,990 | Net after 3 years | -$4,604 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S9Score: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15-194T18.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S9 vs Canaan Avalon A15-194T: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15-194T is more profitable at $-1.69/day compared to $-2.73/day for the Antminer S9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S9 or the Canaan Avalon A15-194T better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Canaan Avalon A15-194T is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer S9 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S9 or the Canaan Avalon A15-194T?
The Antminer S9 scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Canaan Avalon A15-194T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer S9 and Canaan Avalon A15-194T?
The Antminer S9 runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon A15-194T runs at 18.8 J/TH — a difference of 77.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficiency (96.4 vs 18.8 J/TH).