Antminer S9i vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S9i | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 130.0 TH/s |
| 1,320 W | Power Consumption | 3,250 W |
| 94.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 4,504 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,089 BTU/hr |
| 83/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S9i
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366
Based on BTC price of $79,086 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 829% more hashrate (14.0 vs 130.0 TH/s). The Antminer S9i holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer S9i and Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 829% more hashrate (14.0 vs 130.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S9i 59% better power draw (1,320 vs 3,250 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 73% better efficiency (94.3 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S9i 68% better weight (4.2 vs 13.0 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 146% more heat output (4,504 vs 11,089 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S9i 277% more home mining score (83.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S9i | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$2.66 | Daily net profit | -$3.07 |
| -$970 | Net after 1 year | -$1,819 |
| -$1,941 | Net after 2 years | -$2,939 |
| -$2,911 | Net after 3 years | -$4,059 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S9iScore: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner Made A136625.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer S9i or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S9i is more profitable at $-2.66/day compared to $-3.07/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer S9i or Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
The Antminer S9i is quieter at 76 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer S9i or the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366?
The Antminer S9i scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S9i vs Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S9i runs at 94.3 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner Made A1366 runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 69.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficiency (94.3 vs 25.0 J/TH).