Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer AL1

Antminer AL1

Hashrate 16.0 TH/s Power 3,360 W Efficiency 210.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer S9i

Antminer S9i

Hashrate 14.0 TH/s Power 1,320 W Efficiency 94.3 J/TH

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S9i

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer AL1 Specification Antminer S9i
16.0 TH/s Hashrate 14.0 TH/s
3,360 W Power Consumption 1,320 W
210.0 J/TH Efficiency 94.3 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 76 dB
14.5 kg Weight 4.2 kg
11,464 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,504 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 83/100
Release Year
Blake3 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer AL1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.57
Daily Electricity -$8.06
Daily Profit -$7.49
Monthly -$224.72
Yearly -$2,734.05

Antminer S9i

Daily Revenue 0.00000644 BTC $0.50
Daily Electricity -$3.17
Daily Profit -$2.67
Monthly -$79.99
Yearly -$973.17

Based on BTC price of $77,884 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S9i, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Where it pulls away hardest is 61% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,320 W). The Antminer AL1 claws back ground on hashrate and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer S9i — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer AL1 and Antminer S9i diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer AL1 14% more hashrate (16.0 vs 14.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S9i 61% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,320 W)
  • Antminer S9i 55% better efficiency (210.0 vs 94.3 J/TH)
  • Antminer AL1 1% better noise (75.0 vs 76.0 dB)
  • Antminer S9i 71% better weight (14.5 vs 4.2 kg)
  • Antminer AL1 155% more heat output (11,464 vs 4,504 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S9i 131% more home mining score (36.0 vs 83.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer AL1 Metric Antminer S9i
$10,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.49 Daily net profit -$2.67
-$12,734 Net after 1 year -$973
-$15,468 Net after 2 years -$1,946
-$18,202 Net after 3 years -$2,920
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S9i

Score: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S9i

94.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer AL1 or Antminer S9i more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S9i is more profitable at $-2.67/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer AL1 or the Antminer S9i better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer S9i at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S9i: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S9i scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S9i: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer S9i runs at 94.3 J/TH — a difference of 115.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficiency (210.0 vs 94.3 J/TH).