Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S9i

Antminer S9i

Hashrate 14.0 TH/s Power 1,320 W Efficiency 94.3 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Hashrate 262.0 TH/s Power 3,799 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH

Antminer S9i vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S9i Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M72
14.0 TH/s Hashrate 262.0 TH/s
1,320 W Power Consumption 3,799 W
94.3 J/TH Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
76 dB Noise Level 75 dB
4.2 kg Weight 25.5 kg
4,504 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,962 BTU/hr
83/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S9i

Daily Revenue 0.00000644 BTC $0.51
Daily Electricity -$3.17
Daily Profit -$2.66
Monthly -$79.75
Yearly -$970.35

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

Daily Revenue 0.00012057 BTC $9.54
Daily Electricity -$9.12
Daily Profit $0.42
Monthly $12.53
Yearly $152.44

Based on BTC price of $79,086 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 1771% more hashrate (14.0 vs 262.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72's favour. The Antminer S9i holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer S9i and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 1771% more hashrate (14.0 vs 262.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S9i 65% better power draw (1,320 vs 3,799 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 85% better efficiency (94.3 vs 14.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 1% better noise (76.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Antminer S9i 84% better weight (4.2 vs 25.5 kg)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 188% more heat output (4,504 vs 12,962 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S9i 177% more home mining score (83.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

$3.08/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S9i

Score: 83/100. 76 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer S9i or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is more profitable at $0.42/day compared to $-2.66/day for the Antminer S9i. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer S9i or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer S9i at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer S9i vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S9i scores 83/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer S9i vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer S9i runs at 94.3 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 79.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (94.3 vs 14.5 J/TH).