Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer T17

Antminer T17

Hashrate 40.0 TH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 55.0 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M3

MicroBT Whatsminer M3

Hashrate 12.0 TH/s Power 2,000 W Efficiency 166.7 J/TH

Antminer T17 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer T17 Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M3
40.0 TH/s Hashrate 12.0 TH/s
2,200 W Power Consumption 2,000 W
55.0 J/TH Efficiency 166.7 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level
9.5 kg Weight 8,100.0 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,824 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer T17

Daily Revenue 0.00001898 BTC $1.50
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$3.78
Monthly -$113.48
Yearly -$1,380.69

MicroBT Whatsminer M3

Daily Revenue 0.00000569 BTC $0.45
Daily Electricity -$4.80
Daily Profit -$4.35
Monthly -$130.52
Yearly -$1,588.05

Based on BTC price of $78,880 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer T17 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 233% more hashrate (40.0 vs 12.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M3 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer T17 — wins on 4 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Antminer T17 and MicroBT Whatsminer M3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer T17 233% more hashrate (40.0 vs 12.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M3 9% better power draw (2,200 vs 2,000 W)
  • Antminer T17 67% better efficiency (55.0 vs 166.7 J/TH)
  • Antminer T17 100% better weight (9.5 vs 8,100.0 kg)
  • Antminer T17 10% more heat output (7,506 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer T17 200% more home mining score (84.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer T17

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer T17

55.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer T17 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer T17 is more profitable at $-3.78/day compared to $-4.35/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer T17 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Antminer T17 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer T17 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer T17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer T17 and MicroBT Whatsminer M3 on J/TH?

The Antminer T17 runs at 55.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M3 runs at 166.7 J/TH — a difference of 111.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficiency (55.0 vs 166.7 J/TH).