Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| 84.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 200.0 TH/s |
| 3,150 W | Power Consumption | 3,980 W |
| 37.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,580 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)
MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). The standout gap is 138% more hashrate (84.0 vs 200.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT Whatsminer M61's favour. The Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M61 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 138% more hashrate (84.0 vs 200.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) 21% better power draw (3,150 vs 3,980 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 47% better efficiency (37.5 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 26% more heat output (10,748 vs 13,580 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 36% more home mining score (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| $179 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,200 |
| -$4.50 | Daily net profit | -$2.28 |
| -$1,823 | Net after 1 year | -$3,031 |
| -$3,467 | Net after 2 years | -$3,862 |
| -$5,111 | Net after 3 years | -$4,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M61Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M6119.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is more profitable at $-2.28/day compared to $-4.50/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: which runs at a lower noise level?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) or MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M61 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (84Th) runs at 37.5 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 17.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficiency (37.5 vs 19.9 J/TH).