Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Hashrate 375.0 TH/s Power 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
VS
Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd

Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd

Hashrate 446.0 TH/s Power 7,360 W Efficiency 16.5 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Specification Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd
375.0 TH/s Hashrate 446.0 TH/s
5,625 W Power Consumption 7,360 W
15.0 J/TH Efficiency 16.5 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level 50 dB
Weight 20.5 kg
19,193 BTU/hr BTU Output 25,112 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 44/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Bitdeer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00017257 BTC $13.64
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit $0.14
Monthly $4.25
Yearly $51.73

Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd

Daily Revenue 0.00020524 BTC $16.22
Daily Electricity -$17.66
Daily Profit -$1.44
Monthly -$43.18
Yearly -$525.40

Based on BTC price of $79,051 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd 19% more hashrate (375 vs 446 TH/s)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 24% better power draw (5,625 vs 7,360 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 9% better efficiency (15.0 vs 16.5 J/TH)
  • Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd 9% better noise (55.0 vs 50.0 dB)
  • Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd 31% more heat output (19,193 vs 25,112 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 Metric Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd
Upfront cost (MSRP) $6,150
$0.14 Daily net profit -$1.44
+$52 Net after 1 year -$6,675
+$103 Net after 2 years -$7,201
+$155 Net after 3 years -$7,726
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

$1.58/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd

Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $0.14/day compared to $-1.44/day for the Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd?

The Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd on J/TH?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Bitdeer SealMiner A2 Hyd runs at 16.5 J/TH — a difference of 1.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficiency (15.0 vs 16.5 J/TH).