Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Aisen A1 Pro

Aisen A1 Pro

Hashrate 23.0 TH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 95.7 J/TH
VS

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Hashrate 375.0 TH/s Power 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH

Aisen A1 Pro vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Aisen A1 Pro Specification Auradine Teraflux AI3680
23.0 TH/s Hashrate 375.0 TH/s
2,200 W Power Consumption 5,625 W
95.7 J/TH Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
Noise Level 55 dB
Weight
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 19,193 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Aisen Manufacturer Auradine

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Aisen A1 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00001058 BTC $0.82
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$4.46
Monthly -$133.72
Yearly -$1,626.98

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00017257 BTC $13.41
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$0.09
Monthly -$2.68
Yearly -$32.55

Based on BTC price of $77,713 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 1530% more hashrate (23.0 vs 375.0 TH/s). The Aisen A1 Pro claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Aisen A1 Pro and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 1530% more hashrate (23.0 vs 375.0 TH/s)
  • Aisen A1 Pro 61% better power draw (2,200 vs 5,625 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 84% better efficiency (95.7 vs 15.0 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 156% more heat output (7,506 vs 19,193 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Aisen A1 Pro

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Aisen A1 Pro vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-4.46/day for the Aisen A1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Aisen A1 Pro or Auradine Teraflux AI3680?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Aisen A1 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Aisen A1 Pro vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which fits a residential setup better?

The Aisen A1 Pro scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Aisen A1 Pro and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 on J/TH?

The Aisen A1 Pro runs at 95.7 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 80.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (95.7 vs 15.0 J/TH).