Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AI3680 | Specification | Auradine Teraflux AT2880 |
|---|---|---|
| 375.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 260.0 TH/s |
| 5,625 W | Power Consumption | 4,420 W |
| 15.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 17.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | — |
| 19,193 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 15,081 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Auradine |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Based on BTC price of $77,713 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Auradine Teraflux AI3680, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 44% more hashrate (375 vs 260 TH/s). That said, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Auradine Teraflux AT2880 sit on each measurable spec:
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 44% more hashrate (375 vs 260 TH/s)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 21% better power draw (5,625 vs 4,420 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 12% better efficiency (15.0 vs 17.0 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 27% more heat output (19,193 vs 15,081 BTU/hr)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-1.31/day for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 or Auradine Teraflux AT2880?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AI3680 and Auradine Teraflux AT2880?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH — a difference of 2.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 12% better efficiency (15.0 vs 17.0 J/TH).