Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Hashrate 600.0 TH/s Power 8,700 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
VS

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Hashrate 260.0 TH/s Power 4,420 W Efficiency 17.0 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 Specification Auradine Teraflux AT2880
600.0 TH/s Hashrate 260.0 TH/s
8,700 W Power Consumption 4,420 W
14.5 J/TH Efficiency 17.0 J/TH
60 dB Noise Level 75 dB
Weight
29,684 BTU/hr BTU Output 15,081 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Auradine

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Daily Revenue 0.00027611 BTC $21.52
Daily Electricity -$20.88
Daily Profit $0.64
Monthly $19.26
Yearly $234.31

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Daily Revenue 0.00011965 BTC $9.33
Daily Electricity -$10.61
Daily Profit -$1.28
Monthly -$38.45
Yearly -$467.87

Based on BTC price of $77,947 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 edges it: 3 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). The standout gap is 131% more hashrate (600 vs 260 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AH3880's favour. The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AH3880 — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and Auradine Teraflux AT2880 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 131% more hashrate (600 vs 260 TH/s)
  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 49% better power draw (8,700 vs 4,420 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 15% better efficiency (14.5 vs 17.0 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 97% more heat output (29,684 vs 15,081 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

$1.92/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is more profitable at $0.64/day compared to $-1.28/day for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and Auradine Teraflux AT2880 on J/TH?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 15% better efficiency (14.5 vs 17.0 J/TH).