Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer S17

Antminer S17

Hashrate 56.0 TH/s Power 2,520 W Efficiency 45.0 J/TH
VS

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Hashrate 260.0 TH/s Power 4,420 W Efficiency 17.0 J/TH

Antminer S17 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer S17 Specification Auradine Teraflux AT2880
56.0 TH/s Hashrate 260.0 TH/s
2,520 W Power Consumption 4,420 W
45.0 J/TH Efficiency 17.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 75 dB
9.5 kg Weight
8,598 BTU/hr BTU Output 15,081 BTU/hr
84/100 Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Auradine

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer S17

Daily Revenue 0.00002577 BTC $2.01
Daily Electricity -$6.05
Daily Profit -$4.04
Monthly -$121.18
Yearly -$1,474.34

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Daily Revenue 0.00011965 BTC $9.33
Daily Electricity -$10.61
Daily Profit -$1.28
Monthly -$38.45
Yearly -$467.87

Based on BTC price of $77,947 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 364% more hashrate (56.0 vs 260.0 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AT2880's favour. The Antminer S17 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AT2880 — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer S17 and Auradine Teraflux AT2880 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 364% more hashrate (56.0 vs 260.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer S17 43% better power draw (2,520 vs 4,420 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 62% better efficiency (45.0 vs 17.0 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 75% more heat output (8,598 vs 15,081 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S17

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer S17 or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-1.28/day compared to $-4.04/day for the Antminer S17. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer S17 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S17 or Auradine Teraflux AT2880?

The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Antminer S17 vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH — a difference of 28.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficiency (45.0 vs 17.0 J/TH).