Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Aisen A1 Pro

Aisen A1 Pro

Hashrate 23.0 TH/s Power 2,200 W Efficiency 95.7 J/TH
VS

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Hashrate 260.0 TH/s Power 4,420 W Efficiency 17.0 J/TH

Aisen A1 Pro vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Aisen A1 Pro Specification Auradine Teraflux AT2880
23.0 TH/s Hashrate 260.0 TH/s
2,200 W Power Consumption 4,420 W
95.7 J/TH Efficiency 17.0 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
Weight
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 15,081 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithm SHA-256
Aisen Manufacturer Auradine

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Aisen A1 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00001058 BTC $0.82
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$4.46
Monthly -$133.72
Yearly -$1,626.91

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

Daily Revenue 0.00011965 BTC $9.30
Daily Electricity -$10.61
Daily Profit -$1.31
Monthly -$39.23
Yearly -$477.30

Based on BTC price of $77,731 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, hashrate, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 1030% more hashrate (23.0 vs 260.0 TH/s). The Aisen A1 Pro holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AT2880 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Aisen A1 Pro and Auradine Teraflux AT2880 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 1030% more hashrate (23.0 vs 260.0 TH/s)
  • Aisen A1 Pro 50% better power draw (2,200 vs 4,420 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 82% better efficiency (95.7 vs 17.0 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AT2880 101% more heat output (7,506 vs 15,081 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Aisen A1 Pro

Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AT2880

17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Aisen A1 Pro or Auradine Teraflux AT2880 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-1.31/day compared to $-4.46/day for the Aisen A1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Aisen A1 Pro or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Aisen A1 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Aisen A1 Pro or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880?

The Aisen A1 Pro scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Aisen A1 Pro vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Aisen A1 Pro runs at 95.7 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH — a difference of 78.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (95.7 vs 17.0 J/TH).