Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Auradine Teraflux AT2880 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 260.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 4,420 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 17.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 15,081 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Auradine |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Based on BTC price of $77,657 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 1757% more hashrate (14.0 vs 260.0 TH/s) in the Auradine Teraflux AT2880's favour. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Auradine Teraflux AT2880 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 1757% more hashrate (14.0 vs 260.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 69% better power draw (1,350 vs 4,420 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 82% better efficiency (96.4 vs 17.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 227% more heat output (4,606 vs 15,081 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Auradine Teraflux AT2880 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$1.32 |
| -$1,349 | Net after 1 year | -$481 |
| -$2,349 | Net after 2 years | -$961 |
| -$3,349 | Net after 3 years | -$1,442 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AT288017.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-1.32/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Auradine Teraflux AT2880?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Auradine Teraflux AT2880?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH — a difference of 79.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficiency (96.4 vs 17.0 J/TH).