Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Auradine Teraflux AH3880 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 600.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Power Consumption | 8,700 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 60 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 29,684 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Auradine |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Auradine Teraflux AH3880
Based on BTC price of $77,795 and current network difficulty as of May 21, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 4186% more hashrate (14.0 vs 600.0 TH/s). The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Auradine Teraflux AH3880 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 4186% more hashrate (14.0 vs 600.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 84% better power draw (1,350 vs 8,700 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 85% better efficiency (96.4 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 8% better noise (55.0 vs 60.0 dB)
- Auradine Teraflux AH3880 544% more heat output (4,606 vs 29,684 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Auradine Teraflux AH3880 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | $0.60 |
| -$1,349 | Net after 1 year | +$219 |
| -$2,348 | Net after 2 years | +$438 |
| -$3,348 | Net after 3 years | +$657 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Auradine Teraflux AH3880$3.34/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AH388014.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 is more profitable at $0.60/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 81.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficiency (96.4 vs 14.5 J/TH).